PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMH vs. CRTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMH vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARMH

1D
2.87%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRTC

1D
-0.19%
1M
6.02%
YTD
9.78%
6M
10.59%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and CRTC is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMH vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMH

CRTC
CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMH vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARMH vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMHCRTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

471,500.14

1.40

+471,498.74

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum CRTC drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and CRTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMHCRTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-19.07%

+17.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-2.13%

+1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

Volatility

ARMH vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMHCRTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.00%

12.72%

+100.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.00%

15.73%

+97.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.00%

15.73%

+97.27%

ARMH vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARMH vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM202520242023
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
0.98%1.03%1.13%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARMH and CRTC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CRTC.

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.35% for CRTC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMH and CRTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer