PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMH vs. BAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMH vs. BAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARMH

1D
2.87%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAI

1D
-0.40%
1M
18.14%
YTD
55.29%
6M
51.89%
1Y
97.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. BAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and BAI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMH vs. BAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMH

BAI
BAI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMH vs. BAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARMH vs. BAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMHBAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

471,500.14

1.69

+471,498.45

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. BAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum BAI drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and BAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMHBAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-34.09%

+32.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.40%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-6.93%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

Volatility

ARMH vs. BAI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMHBAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.00%

32.43%

+80.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.00%

35.06%

+77.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.00%

35.06%

+77.94%

ARMH vs. BAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BAI's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARMH vs. BAI - Dividend Comparison

ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARMH and BAI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BAI.

BAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.55% for BAI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMH and BAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer