ARMG vs. SPUU
ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ARMG is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. Over the past year, ARMG returned 443.95% vs 54.50% for SPUU. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
ARMG vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 841.05% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 20.66% return.
ARMG
- 1D
- -9.19%
- 1M
- 211.14%
- YTD
- 841.05%
- 6M
- 460.44%
- 1Y
- 443.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 9.03%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.95%
- 1Y
- 54.50%
- 3Y*
- 38.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.36%
- 10Y*
- 24.74%
ARMG vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 841.05% | -61.80% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 20.66% | 28.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMG and SPUU is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.59 |
The correlation between ARMG and SPUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMG vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
ARMG
SPUU
ARMG vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARMG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.38 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.57 | 3.01 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 13.28 | -1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43 | 2.29 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.64 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
ARMG vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.28% | -59.35% | -20.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.13% | -18.19% | -49.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -0.58% | -8.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.91% | -9.50% | -43.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.55% | 4.12% | +34.43% |
Volatility
ARMG vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a higher volatility of 66.47% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.60%. This indicates that ARMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 66.47% | 5.60% | +60.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.49% | 18.10% | +86.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 130.67% | 23.88% | +106.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 138.36% | 33.46% | +104.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 138.36% | 35.76% | +102.60% |
ARMG vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMG vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SPUU's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.52% | 4.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 1.33% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMG and SPUU have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMG has higher volatility (66.47%) compared to SPUU (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMG dropped -80.28% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 443.95% vs 54.50% for SPUU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 443.95% return vs 54.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARMG.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.52% for ARMG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARMG and 0.64% for SPUU.
ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARMG and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer