ARMG vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. ARMG is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, ARMG returned 232.12% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. ARMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

ARMG vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 647.02% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.

ARMG

• 1D: -20.34%
• 1M: 24.90%
• YTD: 647.02%
• 6M: 611.39%
• 1Y: 232.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMG vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	647.02%	-58.82%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMG and RBIL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

ARMG vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMG

ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 56
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMG vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARMG	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	4.35	-2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	6.69	-4.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	2.13	-0.80
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	7.82	-4.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.98	42.95	-36.97

ARMG vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMG and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARMG vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMG	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.28%	-0.52%	-79.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.13%	-0.52%	-67.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.86%	-0.50%	-31.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.77%	-0.07%	-51.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.00%	0.10%	+38.90%

Volatility

ARMG vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a higher volatility of 71.55% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that ARMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARMG	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	71.55%	0.36%	+71.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	117.30%	0.85%	+116.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	141.46%	0.95%	+140.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	143.77%	1.07%	+142.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	143.77%	1.07%	+142.70%

ARMG vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMG vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	0.65%	4.86%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMG and RBIL in my portfolio?

ARMG and RBIL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARMG or RBIL?

ARMG has higher volatility (71.55%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMG dropped -80.28% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, ARMG or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 232.12% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARMG or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 232.12% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARMG or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARMG or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.65% for ARMG.

What is the main difference between ARMG and RBIL?

ARMG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARMG and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.