ARMG vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ARMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

ARMG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 188.60% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

ARMG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -46.52%
• 6M: 209.21%
• YTD: 188.60%
• 1Y: 58.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.97%

LINT

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -46.62%
• 6M: 135.02%
• YTD: 266.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	$14.41M	$19.14M	$65.85M
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.84M	$20.02M	$35.16M

ARMG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	188.60%	-37.37%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	266.23%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMG and LINT is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

ARMG vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARMG

ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 30
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 21

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARMG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARMG	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.43	—	—

Drawdowns

ARMG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMG	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.28%	-69.02%	-11.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.68%	-62.23%	-11.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.19%	-24.07%	-28.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMG	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	49.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	128.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	147.13%	169.02%	-21.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	145.23%	169.02%	-23.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	145.23%	169.02%	-23.79%

ARMG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than LINT's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	1.69%	4.86%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.74%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMG and LINT in my portfolio?

ARMG and LINT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARMG or LINT?

On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARMG or LINT?

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARMG or LINT?

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.74% for LINT.

What is the main difference between ARMG and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARMG and 0.97% for LINT.