ARMG vs. IAK
ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. ARMG is actively managed, while IAK is passively managed. Over the past year, ARMG returned 58.82% vs 19.67% for IAK. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ARMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IAK.
Performance
ARMG vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 188.60% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 10.11% return.
ARMG
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -46.52%
- 6M
- 209.21%
- YTD
- 188.60%
- 1Y
- 58.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.97%
IAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 19.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 15.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.41M | $19.14M | $65.85M | |
| $15.27M | $20.59M | $12.29M |
ARMG vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 188.60% | -62.65% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 10.11% | 12.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMG and IAK is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | -0.09 |
The correlation between ARMG and IAK shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMG vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
ARMG
IAK
ARMG vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMG | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 2.59 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | 6.29 | -4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMG vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, roughly equal to the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMG | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.28% | -77.38% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.64% | -7.62% | -69.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.68% | -3.20% | -70.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.19% | -16.01% | -36.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.34% | 3.13% | +38.21% |
Volatility
ARMG vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a higher volatility of 49.60% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 6.56%. This indicates that ARMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMG | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 49.60% | 6.56% | +43.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 128.11% | 12.42% | +115.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 147.13% | 15.99% | +131.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.23% | 18.13% | +127.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.23% | 20.92% | +124.31% |
ARMG vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMG vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than IAK's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 1.69% | 4.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.42% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMG and IAK have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMG has higher volatility (49.60%) compared to IAK (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMG dropped -80.28% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 58.82% vs 19.67% for IAK. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 58.82% return vs 19.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARMG.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.69% for ARMG.
ARMG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IAK is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARMG and 0.38% for IAK.
IAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARMG and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer