PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARLP vs. PFLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARLP vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARLP achieves a 17.26% return, which is significantly higher than PFLD's 2.63% return.


ARLP

1D
-0.92%
1M
8.99%
6M
14.36%
YTD
17.26%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
40.15%
10Y*
13.40%
ALL TIME*
15.58%

PFLD

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.31%
6M
1.39%
YTD
2.63%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.60M$5.99M$7.50M
$1.21M$1.10M$1.21M

ARLP vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
17.26%-2.45%39.91%18.83%73.34%195.75%-56.80%-7.36%
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
2.63%1.44%5.48%8.16%-12.73%4.49%5.34%0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ARLP and PFLD is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019

0.16

The correlation between ARLP and PFLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARLP vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARLP
ARLP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ARLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PFLD
PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARLP vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARLPPFLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.30

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

2.31

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.91

10.68

-9.77

ARLP vs. PFLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the PFLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARLP and PFLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARLP vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARLP drawdown since its inception was -90.52%, which is greater than PFLD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARLP and PFLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARLPPFLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.52%

-33.20%

-57.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.92%

-2.23%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.83%

-6.41%

-14.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

-15.51%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.33%

-0.41%

-7.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.27%

-4.08%

-20.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.61%

0.48%

+8.13%

Volatility

ARLP vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.59%. This indicates that ARLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARLPPFLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

0.59%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.91%

2.26%

+14.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.98%

3.23%

+19.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.69%

7.50%

+25.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.67%

13.22%

+36.45%

Dividends

ARLP vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison

ARLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, more than PFLD's 5.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
9.25%11.19%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.54%8.85%19.74%
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
5.45%6.52%7.09%7.09%5.76%4.52%4.79%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARLP and PFLD have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARLP has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to PFLD (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARLP dropped -90.52% vs PFLD's -33.20%.

PFLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARLP and PFLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer