PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRP vs. FTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NRP vs. FTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRP achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than FTI's 52.69% return. Over the past 10 years, NRP has outperformed FTI with an annualized return of 34.01%, while FTI has yielded a comparatively lower 14.13% annualized return.


NRP

1D
-2.93%
1M
-9.98%
YTD
2.96%
6M
1.44%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
38.12%
5Y*
48.62%
10Y*
34.01%

FTI

1D
-2.17%
1M
-8.87%
YTD
52.69%
6M
45.79%
1Y
114.38%
3Y*
67.09%
5Y*
46.11%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRP vs. FTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRP
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
2.96%-1.93%27.43%87.03%72.85%164.73%-25.28%-43.26%55.86%-14.50%
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
52.69%54.90%44.78%66.07%105.91%-15.36%-55.23%12.09%-36.32%-11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NRP and FTI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2002

0.30

The correlation between NRP and FTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NRP:

$9.53

FTI:

$2.59

PE Ratio

NRP:

11.12

FTI:

26.24

PEG Ratio

NRP:

0.71

FTI:

0.03

PS Ratio

NRP:

5.74

FTI:

2.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

NRP:

$184.53M

FTI:

$10.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NRP:

$128.91M

FTI:

$2.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

NRP:

$140.60M

FTI:

$1.13B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRP vs. FTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRP
NRP Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FTI
FTI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRP vs. FTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRPFTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

3.65

-2.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

4.42

-3.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.57

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

8.84

-8.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.60

25.58

-22.98

NRP vs. FTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRP Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the FTI Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRP and FTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRPFTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

3.65

-2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.41

1.09

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.30

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.29

-0.11

Drawdowns

NRP vs. FTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRP drawdown since its inception was -97.11%, which is greater than FTI's maximum drawdown of -91.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRP and FTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRPFTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.11%

-91.74%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.22%

-13.01%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-28.94%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-47.36%

+22.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.75%

-85.71%

+6.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.88%

-11.69%

-3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.53%

-33.95%

-9.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

4.49%

+0.78%

Volatility

NRP vs. FTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) is 7.48%, while TechnipFMC plc (FTI) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that NRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRPFTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

9.75%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

21.81%

-6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

31.56%

-11.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.78%

42.53%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.24%

47.75%

-4.51%

Dividends

NRP vs. FTI - Dividend Comparison

NRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than FTI's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
0.29%0.45%0.69%0.50%0.00%0.00%1.38%2.43%2.66%0.42%0.00%0.00%
NRP
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
2.94%4.03%4.90%5.87%4.97%5.39%9.82%13.18%4.71%6.92%5.57%45.28%

Financials

NRP vs. FTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natural Resource Partners L.P. and TechnipFMC plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
39.35M
2.49B
(NRP) Total Revenue
(FTI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NRP vs. FTI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Natural Resource Partners L.P. and TechnipFMC plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
59.7%
Portfolio components
NRP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 39.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.

NRP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 20.59M and revenue of 39.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.3%.

FTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 351.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

NRP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a net income of 392.00K and revenue of 39.35M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

FTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 260.50M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NRP and FTI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTI has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to NRP (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRP dropped -97.11% vs FTI's -91.74%.

FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRP and FTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer