NRP vs. FTI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI).

Performance

NRP vs. FTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NRP vs. FTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NRP Natural Resource Partners L.P.	16.71%	-1.93%	27.43%	87.03%	72.85%	164.73%	-25.28%	-43.26%	55.86%	-14.50%
FTI TechnipFMC plc	55.26%	54.90%	44.78%	66.07%	105.91%	-15.36%	-55.23%	12.09%	-36.32%	-11.44%

Fundamentals

EPS NRP : $11.89 FTI : $2.29
PE Ratio NRP : 10.18 FTI : 30.18
PEG Ratio NRP : 0.31 FTI : 0.03
PS Ratio NRP : 5.38 FTI : 2.93
Total Revenue (TTM) NRP : $199.17M FTI : $9.93B
Gross Profit (TTM) NRP : $144.80M FTI : $1.72B
EBITDA (TTM) NRP : $25.67M FTI : $1.40B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRP achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly lower than FTI's 55.26% return. Over the past 10 years, NRP has outperformed FTI with an annualized return of 41.08%, while FTI has yielded a comparatively lower 14.04% annualized return.

NRP

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 16.71%
• 6M: 16.89%
• 1Y: 19.96%
• 3Y*: 38.95%
• 5Y*: 59.52%
• 10Y*: 41.08%

FTI

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 55.26%
• 6M: 75.58%
• 1Y: 119.24%
• 3Y*: 72.85%
• 5Y*: 54.61%
• 10Y*: 14.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NRP vs. FTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRP

NRP Risk / Return Rank: 66
NRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
NRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NRP Omega Ratio Rank: 62
NRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
NRP Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FTI

FTI Risk / Return Rank: 95
FTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FTI Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FTI Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRP vs. FTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NRP	FTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	3.00	-2.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	3.36	-2.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.53	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	4.24	-2.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	17.06	-13.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NRP vs. FTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRP Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the FTI Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRP and FTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NRP	FTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	3.00	-2.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.70	1.27	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	0.29	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.29	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between NRP and FTI is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NRP vs. FTI - Dividend Comparison

NRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than FTI's 0.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NRP Natural Resource Partners L.P.	2.58%	4.03%	4.90%	5.87%	4.97%	5.39%	9.82%	13.18%	4.71%	6.92%	5.57%	45.28%
FTI TechnipFMC plc	0.29%	0.45%	0.69%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	1.38%	2.43%	2.66%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NRP vs. FTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRP drawdown since its inception was -97.11%, which is greater than FTI's maximum drawdown of -91.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRP and FTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRP	FTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.11%	-91.74%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.79%	-28.94%	+14.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.24%	-47.36%	+22.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.75%	-85.71%	+6.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.51%	-2.89%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.78%	-34.15%	-9.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.96%	7.20%	-2.24%

Volatility

NRP vs. FTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NRP) is 7.53%, while TechnipFMC plc (FTI) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that NRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRP	FTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.53%	10.34%	-2.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.33%	21.64%	-7.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.30%	40.00%	-13.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.32%	43.33%	-8.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.96%	47.80%	-3.84%

Financials

NRP vs. FTI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Natural Resource Partners L.P. and TechnipFMC plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NRP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 46.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of -723.60M and revenue of 2.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -28.8%.

NRP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 32.16M and revenue of 46.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.8%.

FTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of -109.50M and revenue of 2.52B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.4%.

NRP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Natural Resource Partners L.P. reported a net income of 620.00K and revenue of 46.71M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.

FTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 242.70M and revenue of 2.52B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.