ARKX vs. FNGO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) and FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKX is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by ARK, while FNGO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). ARKX is actively managed, while FNGO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARKX returned 10.38%/yr vs 25.62%/yr for FNGO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FNGO.

Performance

ARKX vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKX achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than FNGO's 8.91% return.

ARKX

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: -2.96%
• YTD: 16.56%
• 6M: 17.78%
• 1Y: 52.99%
• 3Y*: 31.55%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: —

FNGO

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -7.03%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 49.78%
• 5Y*: 25.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKX vs. FNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF	16.56%	48.46%	26.67%	24.37%	-34.27%	-8.05%
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	8.91%	25.49%	101.65%	240.10%	-71.55%	30.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKX and FNGO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021	0.67

The correlation between ARKX and FNGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARKX vs. FNGO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKX	FNGO
Industrials	55.7%	-
Technology	27.4%	59.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	11.3%
Communication Services	7.6%	28.8%
Healthcare	1.5%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	10.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ARKX vs. FNGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKX

ARKX Risk / Return Rank: 51
ARKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ARKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ARKX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ARKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ARKX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 20
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKX vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKX	FNGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	0.64	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	1.10	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.13	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	0.62	+1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.87	1.62	+5.25

ARKX vs. FNGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the FNGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKX and FNGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKX vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKX drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKX and FNGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKX	FNGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.61%	-78.39%	+34.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.42%	-42.73%	+22.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.47%	-47.64%	+22.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.61%	-78.39%	+34.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.49%	-18.46%	+7.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-23.87%	+3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.74%	16.45%	-8.71%

Volatility

ARKX vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) is 12.77%, while MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a volatility of 17.58%. This indicates that ARKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKX	FNGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.77%	17.58%	-4.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.51%	33.63%	-7.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.50%	41.88%	-8.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.02%	60.50%	-32.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.65%	61.61%	-33.96%

ARKX vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKX vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARKX nor FNGO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKX and FNGO in my portfolio?

ARKX and FNGO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKX or FNGO?

FNGO has higher volatility (17.58%) compared to ARKX (12.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKX dropped -43.61% vs FNGO's -78.39%.

Which ETF is better, ARKX or FNGO?

On 5-year performance, FNGO leads with 25.62% vs 10.38% for ARKX. On fees, ARKX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ARKX has been the lower-risk option at 12.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKX or FNGO?

Over the 5-year period, FNGO has performed better with a 25.62% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKX or FNGO?

ARKX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKX or FNGO?

ARKX and FNGO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ARKX and FNGO?

ARKX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FNGO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKX and 0.95% for FNGO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.