ARKW vs. XOMO
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARKW returned -4.74% vs 29.81% for XOMO. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
ARKW vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 20.15% return.
ARKW
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- -4.64%
- 1Y
- -4.74%
- 3Y*
- 32.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.87%
XOMO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.17M | $12.26M | $13.73M | |
| $559.24K | $694.66K | $715.05K |
ARKW vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -4.64% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 29.77% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.15% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -8.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and XOMO is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ARKW and XOMO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
XOMO
ARKW vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKW | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.26 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 1.74 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 4.35 | -4.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -18.90% | -61.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -17.25% | -18.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.57% | -7.65% | -15.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -7.50% | -16.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.38% | 6.89% | +12.49% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) at 6.21%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 6.21% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.80% | 17.24% | +8.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.40% | 20.67% | +12.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.79% | 19.19% | +24.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.84% | 19.19% | +18.65% |
ARKW vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than XOMO's 37.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.67% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.07% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and XOMO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKW has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to XOMO (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs XOMO's -18.90%.
On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 29.81% vs -4.74% for ARKW. On fees, ARKW is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 29.81% return vs -4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKW is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.07%, compared with 1.67% for ARKW.
ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ARK and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer