ARKW vs. FBL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ARKW returned 36.42%/yr vs 25.43%/yr for FBL. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for FBL.

Performance

ARKW vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -34.05% return.

ARKW

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -3.08%
• YTD: -4.37%
• 6M: -7.45%
• 1Y: 10.46%
• 3Y*: 36.42%
• 5Y*: 0.46%
• 10Y*: 22.51%

FBL

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -17.09%
• YTD: -34.05%
• 6M: -31.11%
• 1Y: -46.30%
• 3Y*: 25.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKW vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	-4.37%	38.93%	42.27%	96.89%	-10.72%
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	-34.05%	0.50%	112.72%	341.59%	-1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKW and FBL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022	0.53

The correlation between ARKW and FBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKW vs. FBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKW	FBL
Technology	45.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	16.3%	-
Communication Services	14.9%	66.7%
Financial Services	14.2%	-
Industrials	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ARKW vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKW

ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 14
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FBL

FBL Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKW vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKW	FBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	-0.65	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	-0.73	+1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.91	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	-0.76	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.59	-1.36	+1.95

ARKW vs. FBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKW Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the FBL Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKW and FBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKW vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than FBL's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and FBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKW	FBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.52%	-61.15%	-19.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.21%	-61.03%	+24.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.21%	-61.15%	+24.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.35%	-57.26%	+33.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.97%	-16.70%	-7.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.89%	33.98%	-16.09%

Volatility

ARKW vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is 10.38%, while GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a volatility of 20.60%. This indicates that ARKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKW	FBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.38%	20.60%	-10.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.57%	53.92%	-29.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.92%	71.02%	-38.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.59%	71.08%	-27.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.73%	71.08%	-33.35%

ARKW vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKW vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than FBL's 3.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	1.66%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	1.29%	0.00%	13.05%	2.05%	0.00%	2.29%
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	3.14%	2.07%	0.00%	51.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKW and FBL in my portfolio?

ARKW and FBL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKW or FBL?

FBL has higher volatility (20.60%) compared to ARKW (10.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs FBL's -61.15%.

Which ETF is better, ARKW or FBL?

On 3-year performance, ARKW leads with 36.42% vs 25.43% for FBL. On fees, ARKW is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 10.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKW or FBL?

Over the 3-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 36.42% return vs 25.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKW or FBL?

ARKW is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for FBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKW or FBL?

FBL has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 1.66% for ARKW.

What is the main difference between ARKW and FBL?

ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FBL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 1.15% for FBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.