ARKQ vs. XME
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. ARKQ is actively managed, while XME is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ returned 22.08%/yr vs 19.14%/yr for XME. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.
Performance
ARKQ vs. XME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly higher than XME's 16.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has outperformed XME with an annualized return of 22.08%, while XME has yielded a comparatively lower 19.14% annualized return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 64.14%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.08%
XME
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 16.50%
- 6M
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- 85.37%
- 3Y*
- 35.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.93%
- 10Y*
- 19.14%
ARKQ vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 17.47% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 25.94% | -7.89% | 52.26% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.50% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and XME is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ARKQ and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ARKQ vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKQ
XME
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
ARKQ
XME
Technology
ARKQ
XME
Consumer Cyclical
ARKQ
XME
-
Communication Services
ARKQ
XME
-
Energy
ARKQ
XME
Healthcare
ARKQ
XME
-
Utilities
ARKQ
XME
-
Basic Materials
ARKQ
-
XME
Consumer Defensive
ARKQ
-
XME
Financial Services
ARKQ
-
XME
-
Real Estate
ARKQ
-
XME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
XME
ARKQ vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKQ | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.80 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 9.44 | -0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and XME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -85.89% | +26.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -22.60% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | -30.47% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | -37.27% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | -61.69% | +1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -9.18% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -44.08% | +26.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 9.07% | -2.09% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. XME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is 13.37%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that ARKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.37% | 15.14% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.41% | 28.15% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.76% | 36.17% | -2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 32.83% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 32.93% | -2.92% |
ARKQ vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. XME - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than XME's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and XME have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to ARKQ (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs XME's -85.89%.
On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 19.14% for XME. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 19.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
XME has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.
ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while XME is Materials. They also come from different issuers: ARK and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.35% for XME.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and XME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer