ARKQ vs. SSLN.L
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. ARKQ is actively managed, while SSLN.L is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ returned 21.73%/yr vs 14.24%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
ARKQ vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ARKQ is traded in USD, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's -5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 21.73%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.24% annualized return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- 12.86%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 55.23%
- 3Y*
- 32.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.73%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 5.12%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -5.64%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 85.51%
- 3Y*
- 41.29%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.24%
ARKQ vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 12.86% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 25.94% | -7.89% | 52.26% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.64% | 147.64% | 21.15% | -1.25% | 3.38% | -12.63% | 45.36% | 17.20% | -8.94% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and SSLN.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.15 |
The correlation between ARKQ and SSLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
SSLN.L
ARKQ vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKQ | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.95 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 4.30 | +3.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -83.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -83.11% | +23.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -43.71% | +23.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | -43.71% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | -43.71% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | -43.71% | -16.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.02% | -40.83% | +30.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.22% | -65.48% | +48.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.97% | 19.83% | -12.86% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is 12.70%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that ARKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.70% | 15.39% | -2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.15% | 53.94% | -27.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.54% | 56.70% | -23.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.50% | 38.19% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 32.34% | -2.36% |
ARKQ vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while SSLN.L is Silver. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer