PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKQ vs. IQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKQ vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 21.70% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 38.49% return.


ARKQ

1D
0.51%
1M
9.53%
YTD
21.70%
6M
21.88%
1Y
73.83%
3Y*
39.06%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
22.42%

IQM

1D
-1.20%
1M
9.28%
YTD
38.49%
6M
34.62%
1Y
72.20%
3Y*
37.11%
5Y*
21.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKQ vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
21.70%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.99%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
38.49%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%78.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and IQM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020

0.85

The correlation between ARKQ and IQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKQ vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKQ
IQM

Industrials

37.1%
19.9%

Technology

32.6%
65.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.9%
4.1%

Communication Services

8.1%
2.1%

Healthcare

2.2%
1.1%

Energy

1.9%
2.7%

Utilities

1.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

ARKQ
37.1%
IQM
19.9%

Technology

ARKQ
32.6%
IQM
65.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKQ
16.9%
IQM
4.1%

Communication Services

ARKQ
8.1%
IQM
2.1%

Healthcare

ARKQ
2.2%
IQM
1.1%

Energy

ARKQ
1.9%
IQM
2.7%

Utilities

ARKQ
1.3%
IQM
3.3%

Basic Materials

ARKQ

-

IQM

-

Consumer Defensive

ARKQ

-

IQM

-

Financial Services

ARKQ

-

IQM

-

Real Estate

ARKQ

-

IQM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKQ vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARKQIQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

4.94

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

16.15

-5.23

ARKQ vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKQ and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARKQIQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.57

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.76

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.95

-0.29

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than IQM's maximum drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and IQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKQIQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.89%

-44.91%

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.58%

-14.71%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.76%

-30.42%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.71%

-44.91%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-1.57%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-12.24%

-4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

4.49%

+2.30%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 10.40% compared to Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) at 9.33%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKQIQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.40%

9.33%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.44%

22.97%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.48%

28.28%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.22%

28.90%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.83%

30.71%

-0.88%

ARKQ vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKQ vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.22%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKQ and IQM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to IQM (9.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs IQM's -44.91%.

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 21.93% vs 11.51% for ARKQ. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IQM has been the lower-risk option at 9.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 21.93% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

ARKQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while IQM is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.50% for IQM.

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKQ and IQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer