ARKK vs. ONEQ
ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. ARKK is actively managed, while ONEQ is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKK returned 15.90%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for ONEQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.
Performance
ARKK vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKK achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 10.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKK has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 15.90%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.
ARKK
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- 9.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- -9.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
ONEQ
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 29.46%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
ARKK vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | -0.26% | 35.49% | 8.40% | 69.04% | -66.97% | -23.60% | 152.71% | 35.08% | 3.52% | 87.33% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 10.51% | 20.89% | 29.30% | 45.73% | -32.12% | 22.11% | 44.87% | 38.01% | -3.18% | 29.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKK and ONEQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014 | 0.77 |
The correlation between ARKK and ONEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKK vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKK
ONEQ
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
ARKK
ONEQ
Technology
ARKK
ONEQ
Financial Services
ARKK
ONEQ
Consumer Cyclical
ARKK
ONEQ
Communication Services
ARKK
ONEQ
Industrials
ARKK
ONEQ
Basic Materials
ARKK
-
ONEQ
Consumer Defensive
ARKK
-
ONEQ
Energy
ARKK
-
ONEQ
Real Estate
ARKK
-
ONEQ
Utilities
ARKK
-
ONEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKK vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank
ARKK
ONEQ
ARKK vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKK | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.30 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 2.34 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 8.83 | -8.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKK vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKK drawdown since its inception was -80.97%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKK and ONEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKK | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.97% | -55.09% | -25.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.35% | -12.64% | -18.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.56% | -24.09% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.23% | -35.23% | -42.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.97% | -35.23% | -45.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.32% | -5.67% | -44.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.20% | -7.94% | -22.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.61% | 3.34% | +11.27% |
Volatility
ARKK vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a higher volatility of 12.53% compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) at 7.57%. This indicates that ARKK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKK | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.53% | 7.57% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.63% | 13.63% | +13.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.17% | 17.39% | +18.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.46% | 22.36% | +24.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.39% | 21.79% | +18.60% |
ARKK vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKK vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 1.64% | 0.38% | 3.14% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.88% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKK and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKK has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to ONEQ (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKK dropped -80.97% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.
On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 19.60% vs 15.90% for ARKK. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ONEQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 15.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.
ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.
ARKK is categorized as Technology Equities, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKK and 0.21% for ONEQ.
ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKK and ONEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer