PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARGT vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARGT vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ARGT has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 17.46%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.


ARGT

1D
-3.12%
1M
5.42%
YTD
3.65%
6M
0.81%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
33.61%
5Y*
26.82%
10Y*
17.46%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARGT vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
3.65%11.51%63.46%53.64%11.80%3.83%14.58%14.50%-32.62%53.87%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ARGT and SCHD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between ARGT and SCHD has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ARGT vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARGT
SCHD

Consumer Cyclical

26.3%
6.3%

Energy

22.2%
16.2%

Financial Services

13.7%
9.3%

Basic Materials

13.3%
1.2%

Industrials

8.3%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
19.2%

Utilities

5.1%
0.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
6.3%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Healthcare

-

18.8%

Technology

-

16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ARGT
26.3%
SCHD
6.3%

Energy

ARGT
22.2%
SCHD
16.2%

Financial Services

ARGT
13.7%
SCHD
9.3%

Basic Materials

ARGT
13.3%
SCHD
1.2%

Industrials

ARGT
8.3%
SCHD
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

ARGT
6.9%
SCHD
19.2%

Utilities

ARGT
5.1%
SCHD
0.0%

Communication Services

ARGT
2.9%
SCHD
6.3%

Real Estate

ARGT
1.3%
SCHD

-

Healthcare

ARGT

-

SCHD
18.8%

Technology

ARGT

-

SCHD
16.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARGT vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARGT
ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARGT vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARGTSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.16

2.49

-2.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

3.87

-3.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.45

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

5.91

-5.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.57

14.53

-13.96

ARGT vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGT and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARGTSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

2.49

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.58

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.77

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.86

-0.56

Drawdowns

ARGT vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARGTSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.68%

-33.37%

-28.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.97%

-4.61%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.46%

-16.13%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.14%

-16.85%

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.68%

-33.37%

-28.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

-1.40%

-6.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

-3.32%

-18.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.20%

1.88%

+9.32%

Volatility

ARGT vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that ARGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARGTSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

2.66%

+7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.31%

7.66%

+12.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.70%

10.96%

+25.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.92%

14.38%

+17.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.44%

16.72%

+14.72%

ARGT vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARGT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARGT vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
0.81%0.84%1.41%1.59%2.45%0.93%0.28%1.21%1.34%0.49%0.36%0.89%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARGT and SCHD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGT dropped -61.68% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 17.46% vs 12.77% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ARGT.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.81% for ARGT.

ARGT is categorized as Latin America Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ARGT and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARGT and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer