ARGT vs. OTGL
ARGT (Global X MSCI Argentina ETF) and OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - ARGT tracks the MSCI All Argentina 25/50 while OTGL tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARGT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OTGL.
Performance
ARGT vs. OTGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than OTGL's 5.63% return.
ARGT
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 33.61%
- 5Y*
- 26.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
OTGL
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARGT vs. OTGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 3.65% | 14.88% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 5.63% | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARGT and OTGL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARGT vs. OTGL — Risk / Return Rank
ARGT
OTGL
ARGT vs. OTGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARGT | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARGT | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.20 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
ARGT vs. OTGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than OTGL's maximum drawdown of -13.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and OTGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARGT | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.68% | -13.52% | -48.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.96% | -8.97% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -3.00% | -19.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.20% | — | — |
Volatility
ARGT vs. OTGL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARGT | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.70% | 19.02% | +17.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 19.02% | +12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 19.02% | +12.42% |
ARGT vs. OTGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARGT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than OTGL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARGT vs. OTGL - Dividend Comparison
ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than OTGL's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 0.81% | 0.84% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.45% | 0.93% | 0.28% | 1.21% | 1.34% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 0.89% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 1.83% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARGT and OTGL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARGT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARGT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.
OTGL has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.81% for ARGT.
ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50, while OTGL tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Global X and OTG. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ARGT and 0.95% for OTGL.
Find the right allocation for ARGT and OTGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer