OTGL vs. FLBR
OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) and FLBR (Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - OTGL tracks the Actively Managed while FLBR tracks the FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OTGL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLBR.
Performance
OTGL vs. FLBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTGL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than FLBR's 12.86% return.
OTGL
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLBR
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- 12.86%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- —
OTGL vs. FLBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 5.36% | 13.64% |
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF | 12.86% | 17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTGL and FLBR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTGL vs. FLBR — Risk / Return Rank
OTGL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLBR
OTGL vs. FLBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) and Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTGL | FLBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTGL vs. FLBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTGL drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, smaller than the maximum FLBR drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTGL and FLBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTGL | FLBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -57.42% | +43.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -17.50% | +8.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -18.60% | +15.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.38% | — |
Volatility
OTGL vs. FLBR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTGL | FLBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 25.32% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 27.73% | -8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 33.02% | -13.79% |
OTGL vs. FLBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FLBR's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
OTGL vs. FLBR - Dividend Comparison
OTGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than FLBR's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF | 4.80% | 7.71% | 7.68% | 8.84% | 11.99% | 8.71% | 2.32% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 0.42% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 2.83% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OTGL and FLBR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLBR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLBR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.
FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 2.83% for OTGL.
OTGL tracks Actively Managed, while FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: OTG and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OTGL and 0.19% for FLBR.
Find the right allocation for OTGL and FLBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer