ARE vs. SCHG
ARE (Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, ARE returned -4.05%/yr vs 18.26%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARE achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ARE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of -4.05%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.
ARE
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -11.02%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- -32.07%
- 3Y*
- -21.90%
- 5Y*
- -20.35%
- 10Y*
- -4.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.12%
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.37%
ARE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | 5.25% | -46.60% | -19.44% | -9.11% | -32.62% | 28.09% | 13.27% | 44.04% | -8.97% | 20.95% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 4.93% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARE and SCHG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARE and SCHG has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
ARE
SCHG
ARE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.17 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 0.94 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 3.00 | -3.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARE drawdown since its inception was -77.92%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARE and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.92% | -34.59% | -43.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.61% | -16.41% | -35.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.64% | -23.39% | -42.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.92% | -34.59% | -43.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.92% | -34.59% | -43.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.30% | -3.16% | -69.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.93% | -5.19% | -12.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.64% | 5.12% | +29.52% |
Volatility
ARE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.47%. This indicates that ARE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.02% | 4.47% | +6.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.11% | 12.82% | +19.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.95% | 16.43% | +28.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.38% | 22.40% | +10.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 21.57% | +7.86% |
Dividends
ARE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ARE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, more than SCHG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | 6.95% | 9.56% | 5.32% | 3.91% | 3.24% | 2.01% | 2.38% | 2.48% | 3.24% | 2.64% | 2.91% | 3.38% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARE has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to SCHG (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARE dropped -77.92% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARE and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer