ARCX vs. USL
ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ARCX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. ARCX is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. ARCX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
ARCX vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -42.19% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.
ARCX
- 1D
- -4.74%
- 1M
- 14.86%
- YTD
- -42.19%
- 6M
- -60.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 60.58%
- 6M
- 56.11%
- 1Y
- 56.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
ARCX vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | -42.19% | -71.83% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 60.58% | -4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCX and USL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCX vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
ARCX
USL
ARCX vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARCX | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 0.01 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
ARCX vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, roughly equal to the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCX | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -89.06% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.86% | -39.10% | -47.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.50% | -61.45% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.27% | — |
Volatility
ARCX vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCX | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.55% | 28.59% | +109.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 138.55% | 30.09% | +108.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 138.55% | 32.34% | +106.21% |
ARCX vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARCX vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARCX nor USL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCX and USL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USL is cheaper at 0.88% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USL is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ARCX.
ARCX and USL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ARCX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 0.88% for USL.
Find the right allocation for ARCX and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer