ARCX vs. LITX
ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ARCX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.
Performance
ARCX vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARCX
- 1D
- -4.08%
- 1M
- -18.30%
- 6M
- -69.54%
- YTD
- -73.15%
- 1Y
- -87.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -89.54%
LITX
- 1D
- 5.60%
- 1M
- -12.69%
- 6M
- 78.91%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $474.65K | $398.88K | $951.49K | |
| $72.96M | $66.22M | $208.61M |
ARCX vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | -75.45% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 126.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCX and LITX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCX vs. LITX — Risk / Return Rank
ARCX
LITX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARCX vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARCX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARCX vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -94.32%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -73.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.32% | -73.97% | -20.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.90% | -63.99% | -29.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.07% | -25.05% | -43.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.97% | — | — |
Volatility
ARCX vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 97.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.02% | 198.72% | -58.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.59% | 198.72% | -54.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.59% | 198.72% | -54.13% |
ARCX vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARCX vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARCX nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCX and LITX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARCX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARCX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
ARCX and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 1.49% for LITX.
Find the right allocation for ARCX and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer