PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARB vs. ROMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARB vs. ROMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARB achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than ROMO's 6.82% return.


ARB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.92%
6M
1.92%
YTD
1.85%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.08%

ROMO

1D
0.28%
1M
0.49%
6M
3.56%
YTD
6.82%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$421.91K$575.16K$443.27K
$20.73K$35.75K$74.68K

ARB vs. ROMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
1.85%6.05%4.07%3.85%2.67%3.16%3.77%
ROMO
Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF
6.82%9.29%20.68%11.05%-18.88%21.41%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ARB and ROMO is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2020

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARB vs. ROMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARB
ARB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARB Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ROMO
ROMO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ROMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ROMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARB vs. ROMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARBROMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.50

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

5.25

+3.84

ARB vs. ROMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARB Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the ROMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARB and ROMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARB vs. ROMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARB drawdown since its inception was -5.60%, smaller than the maximum ROMO drawdown of -28.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARB and ROMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARBROMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-28.66%

+23.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.54%

-11.16%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.13%

-14.09%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.60%

-20.26%

+14.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.16%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-8.16%

+7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

3.17%

-2.80%

Volatility

ARB vs. ROMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) is 1.75%, while Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that ARB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARBROMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

3.76%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

12.00%

-8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

14.15%

-10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

12.17%

-7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

14.45%

-10.03%

ARB vs. ROMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARB has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ROMO's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARB vs. ROMO - Dividend Comparison

ARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than ROMO's 8.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ARB
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.42%0.43%1.12%0.00%4.18%0.00%2.87%0.00%
ROMO
Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF
8.31%8.87%0.76%2.42%0.77%0.56%0.97%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARB and ROMO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROMO has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to ARB (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARB dropped -5.60% vs ROMO's -28.66%.

On 5-year performance, ROMO leads with 6.47% vs 4.09% for ARB. On fees, ROMO is cheaper at 0.82% per year. On volatility, ARB has been the lower-risk option at 1.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROMO has performed better with a 6.47% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROMO is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for ARB.

ROMO has the higher dividend yield at 8.31%, compared with 0.42% for ARB.

ARB is categorized as Event Driven, while ROMO is Momentum. ARB tracks Water Island Merger Arbitrage USD Hedged Index, while ROMO tracks Newfound/ReSolve Robust Equity Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Water Island and Strategy Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for ARB and 0.82% for ROMO.

ROMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARB and ROMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer