ARAAF vs. RES

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aclara Resources Inc (ARAAF) and RPC, Inc. (RES).

Performance

ARAAF vs. RES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aclara Resources Inc (ARAAF) and RPC, Inc. (RES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARAAF vs. RES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ARAAF Aclara Resources Inc	50.62%	404.63%	-11.58%	49.59%	-78.68%	-7.97%
RES RPC, Inc.	31.06%	-5.49%	-16.39%	-16.42%	96.73%	-0.87%

Fundamentals

EPS ARAAF : -$0.07 RES : $0.15
Total Revenue (TTM) ARAAF : $0.00 RES : $1.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) ARAAF : -$1.03M RES : $393.68M
EBITDA (TTM) ARAAF : -$8.60M RES : $216.94M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARAAF achieves a 50.62% return, which is significantly higher than RES's 31.06% return.

ARAAF

• 1D: 3.66%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: 50.62%
• 6M: 27.90%
• 1Y: 591.57%
• 3Y*: 98.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RES

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 21.86%
• YTD: 31.06%
• 6M: 50.89%
• 1Y: 32.85%
• 3Y*: -0.12%
• 5Y*: 6.47%
• 10Y*: -5.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ARAAF vs. RES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARAAF

ARAAF Risk / Return Rank: 97
ARAAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ARAAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ARAAF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ARAAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ARAAF Martin Ratio Rank: 97

RES

RES Risk / Return Rank: 64
RES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RES Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
RES Omega Ratio Rank: 61
RES Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
RES Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARAAF vs. RES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aclara Resources Inc (ARAAF) and RPC, Inc. (RES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARAAF	RES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.09	0.66	+4.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.12	1.16	+2.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.17	+0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.83	1.36	+8.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.71	2.49	+18.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARAAF vs. RES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARAAF Sharpe Ratio is 5.09, which is higher than the RES Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARAAF and RES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARAAF	RES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.09	0.66	+4.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.20	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between ARAAF and RES is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ARAAF vs. RES - Dividend Comparison

ARAAF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARAAF Aclara Resources Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RES RPC, Inc.	2.26%	2.94%	2.69%	2.20%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	2.86%	4.76%	0.51%	0.25%	1.30%

Drawdowns

ARAAF vs. RES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARAAF drawdown since its inception was -84.58%, smaller than the maximum RES drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARAAF and RES.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARAAF	RES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.58%	-92.34%	+7.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.89%	-24.83%	-32.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.23%	-69.80%	+39.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.21%	-37.35%	-22.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.99%	13.58%	+13.41%

Volatility

ARAAF vs. RES - Volatility Comparison

Aclara Resources Inc (ARAAF) has a higher volatility of 27.64% compared to RPC, Inc. (RES) at 9.38%. This indicates that ARAAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARAAF	RES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.64%	9.38%	+18.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	85.42%	35.11%	+50.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	117.53%	49.79%	+67.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	120.10%	53.60%	+66.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	120.10%	57.18%	+62.92%

Financials