RES vs. QQQ
RES (RPC, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, RES returned -7.22%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RES vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RES achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, RES has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -7.22%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.44% annualized return.
RES
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- 29.20%
- 3Y*
- -9.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- -7.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.14%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.32B | $28.40B | $31.45B | |
RES RPC, Inc. | $8.54M | $7.91M | $10.83M |
RES vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RES RPC, Inc. | 4.47% | -5.49% | -16.39% | -16.42% | 96.73% | 44.13% | -39.89% | -46.14% | -60.21% | 29.61% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 12.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RES and QQQ is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RES and QQQ has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RES vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
RES
QQQ
RES vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPC, Inc. (RES) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RES | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.88 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 6.00 | -3.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RES vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RES drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RES and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RES | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.34% | -82.97% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.62% | -11.96% | -23.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | -22.77% | -29.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.75% | -35.12% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.34% | -35.12% | -57.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.93% | -7.69% | -68.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -32.62% | -5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.80% | 3.74% | +8.06% |
Volatility
RES vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
RPC, Inc. (RES) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that RES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RES | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 6.87% | +5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.75% | 16.08% | +22.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.49% | 19.38% | +28.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.62% | 22.90% | +29.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.39% | 22.50% | +34.89% |
Dividends
RES vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
RES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
RES RPC, Inc. | 2.85% | 2.94% | 2.69% | 2.20% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 4.76% | 0.51% | 0.25% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RES and QQQ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RES has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RES dropped -92.34% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RES and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer