PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RES vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RES and QQQ is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

RES vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPC, Inc. (RES) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.93%
13.48%
RES
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RES:

-0.34

QQQ:

1.40

Sortino Ratio

RES:

-0.25

QQQ:

1.90

Omega Ratio

RES:

0.97

QQQ:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

RES:

-0.19

QQQ:

1.88

Martin Ratio

RES:

-0.78

QQQ:

6.51

Ulcer Index

RES:

18.71%

QQQ:

3.92%

Daily Std Dev

RES:

42.40%

QQQ:

18.23%

Max Drawdown

RES:

-92.34%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

RES:

-74.79%

QQQ:

-0.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RES achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, RES has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -6.30%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.


RES

YTD

3.41%

1M

-11.88%

6M

-0.93%

1Y

-14.51%

5Y*

9.05%

10Y*

-6.30%

QQQ

YTD

5.09%

1M

2.37%

6M

13.48%

1Y

26.98%

5Y*

19.29%

10Y*

18.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RES vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RES is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RES is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RES is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RES is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RES is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RES is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RES vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPC, Inc. (RES) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RES, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.341.40
The chart of Sortino ratio for RES, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.251.90
The chart of Omega ratio for RES, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.971.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for RES, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.191.88
The chart of Martin ratio for RES, currently valued at -0.78, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.786.51
RES
QQQ

The current RES Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RES and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.34
1.40
RES
QQQ

Dividends

RES vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

RES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than QQQ's 0.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RES
RPC, Inc.
2.62%2.69%2.20%0.45%0.00%0.00%2.86%4.76%0.78%0.25%1.30%3.22%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.53%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

RES vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RES drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RES and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-74.79%
-0.42%
RES
QQQ

Volatility

RES vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

RPC, Inc. (RES) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 4.70%. This indicates that RES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.33%
4.70%
RES
QQQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab