RES vs. DHR
RES (RPC, Inc.) and DHR (Danaher Corporation) are both stocks. RES operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while DHR operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, RES returned -6.73%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for DHR. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RES vs. DHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RES achieves a 20.48% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -21.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RES has underperformed DHR with an annualized return of -6.73%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.
RES
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- 20.48%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- -0.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- -6.73%
DHR
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- -21.99%
- 6M
- -21.57%
- 1Y
- -8.64%
- 3Y*
- -4.99%
- 5Y*
- -5.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
RES vs. DHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RES RPC, Inc. | 20.48% | -5.49% | -16.39% | -16.42% | 96.73% | 44.13% | -39.89% | -46.14% | -60.21% | 29.61% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | -21.99% | 0.35% | -0.35% | -1.22% | -19.02% | 48.57% | 45.34% | 49.55% | 11.80% | 20.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RES and DHR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
RES:
$1.43B
DHR:
$126.73B
RES:
$0.10
DHR:
$5.17
RES:
67.37
DHR:
34.48
RES:
0.81
DHR:
5.13
RES:
1.31
DHR:
2.39
RES:
$1.75B
DHR:
$24.78B
RES:
$242.68M
DHR:
$15.04B
RES:
$218.68M
DHR:
$6.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RES vs. DHR — Risk / Return Rank
RES
DHR
RES vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPC, Inc. (RES) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RES | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.97 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | -0.26 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | -0.61 | +3.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RES vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RES drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, which is greater than DHR's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RES and DHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RES | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.34% | -45.80% | -46.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.83% | -32.97% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | -41.72% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.75% | -43.81% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.34% | -43.81% | -48.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.24% | -38.16% | -34.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.53% | -10.24% | -27.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.18% | 14.30% | -4.12% |
Volatility
RES vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison
RPC, Inc. (RES) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to Danaher Corporation (DHR) at 8.80%. This indicates that RES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RES | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 8.80% | +4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.62% | 19.35% | +17.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.07% | 28.09% | +18.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.78% | 27.95% | +24.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.31% | 25.56% | +31.75% |
Dividends
RES vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison
RES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than DHR's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.76% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
RES RPC, Inc. | 2.47% | 2.94% | 2.69% | 2.20% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 4.76% | 0.51% | 0.25% | 1.30% |
Financials
RES vs. DHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RPC, Inc. and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RES vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison
RES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RPC, Inc. reported a gross profit of 99.17M and revenue of 454.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.8%.
DHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.
RES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RPC, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.62M and revenue of 454.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.6%.
DHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.
RES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RPC, Inc. reported a net income of 855.00K and revenue of 454.76M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.
DHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 1.03B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RES and DHR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RES has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to DHR (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RES dropped -92.34% vs DHR's -45.80%.
RES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RES and DHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer