RES vs. DHR
RES (RPC, Inc.) and DHR (Danaher Corporation) are both stocks. RES operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while DHR operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, RES returned -7.22%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for DHR. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RES vs. DHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RES achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RES has underperformed DHR with an annualized return of -7.22%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.
RES
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- 29.20%
- 3Y*
- -9.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- -7.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.14%
DHR
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- -14.47%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- -4.26%
- 5Y*
- -5.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.81B | $1.26B | $962.73M | |
RES RPC, Inc. | $8.54M | $7.91M | $10.83M |
RES vs. DHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RES RPC, Inc. | 4.47% | -5.49% | -16.39% | -16.42% | 96.73% | 44.13% | -39.89% | -46.14% | -60.21% | 29.61% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | -14.47% | 0.35% | -0.35% | -1.22% | -19.02% | 48.57% | 45.34% | 49.55% | 11.80% | 20.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RES and DHR is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.19 |
The correlation between RES and DHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RES:
$1.24B
DHR:
$137.13B
RES:
$0.10
DHR:
$5.63
RES:
53.69
DHR:
34.62
RES:
0.69
DHR:
5.52
RES:
1.12
DHR:
2.62
RES:
$1.79B
DHR:
$25.11B
RES:
$254.77M
DHR:
$14.69B
RES:
$215.32M
DHR:
$6.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RES vs. DHR — Risk / Return Rank
RES
DHR
RES vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPC, Inc. (RES) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RES | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.03 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | -0.01 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | -0.02 | +2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RES vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RES drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, which is greater than DHR's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RES and DHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RES | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.34% | -45.80% | -46.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.62% | -32.97% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | -41.72% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.75% | -43.81% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.34% | -43.81% | -48.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.93% | -32.19% | -43.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -10.30% | -27.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.80% | 15.66% | -3.86% |
Volatility
RES vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RPC, Inc. (RES) is 11.90%, while Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a volatility of 15.48%. This indicates that RES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RES | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 15.48% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.75% | 24.23% | +14.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.49% | 31.20% | +16.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.62% | 28.76% | +23.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.39% | 26.01% | +31.38% |
Dividends
RES vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison
RES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than DHR's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
RES RPC, Inc. | 2.85% | 2.94% | 2.69% | 2.20% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 4.76% | 0.51% | 0.25% | 1.30% |
Financials
RES vs. DHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RPC, Inc. and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RES vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison
RES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RPC, Inc. reported a gross profit of 158.01M and revenue of 460.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
DHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.61B and revenue of 6.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.
RES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RPC, Inc. reported an operating income of 14.77M and revenue of 460.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
DHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 6.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.
RES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RPC, Inc. reported a net income of 12.08M and revenue of 460.87M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
DHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 870.00M and revenue of 6.27B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RES and DHR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHR has higher volatility (15.48%) compared to RES (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RES dropped -92.34% vs DHR's -45.80%.
RES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RES and DHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer