RES vs. ITB
RES (RPC, Inc.) is a stock, while ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) is Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Over the past 10 years, RES returned -7.22%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for ITB. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RES vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RES achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's -1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, RES has underperformed ITB with an annualized return of -7.22%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.
RES
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- 29.20%
- 3Y*
- -9.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- -7.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.14%
ITB
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- -5.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $179.18M | $195.32M | $218.82M | |
RES RPC, Inc. | $8.54M | $7.91M | $10.83M |
RES vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RES RPC, Inc. | 4.47% | -5.49% | -16.39% | -16.42% | 96.73% | 44.13% | -39.89% | -46.14% | -60.21% | 29.61% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -1.69% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RES and ITB is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RES and ITB has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RES vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
RES
ITB
RES vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPC, Inc. (RES) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RES | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.01 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | -0.10 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | -0.17 | +2.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RES vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RES drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, which is greater than ITB's maximum drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RES and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RES | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.34% | -86.53% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.62% | -26.04% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | -33.35% | -18.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.75% | -40.55% | -23.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.34% | -52.10% | -40.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.93% | -25.47% | -50.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -36.98% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.80% | 14.54% | -2.74% |
Volatility
RES vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
RPC, Inc. (RES) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) at 8.79%. This indicates that RES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RES | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 8.79% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.75% | 22.03% | +16.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.49% | 29.51% | +17.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.62% | 29.57% | +23.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.39% | 30.20% | +27.19% |
Dividends
RES vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
RES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than ITB's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.68% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
RES RPC, Inc. | 2.85% | 2.94% | 2.69% | 2.20% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 4.76% | 0.51% | 0.25% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RES and ITB have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RES has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to ITB (8.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RES dropped -92.34% vs ITB's -86.53%.
RES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RES and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer