PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RES vs. ITB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RES vs. ITB

Last updated Jul 11, 2026
Documentation

RES (RPC, Inc.) is a stock, while ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) is Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Over the past 10 years, RES returned -8.36%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for ITB. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RES vs. ITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPC, Inc. (RES) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RES achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RES has underperformed ITB with an annualized return of -8.36%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.

RES

1D
1.44%
1M
-21.42%
6M
-3.16%
YTD
5.21%
1Y
12.94%
3Y*
-8.83%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
-8.36%

ITB

1D
-1.49%
1M
-0.51%
6M
-10.42%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
-1.85%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RES vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RES
RPC, Inc.		5.21%-5.49%-16.39%-16.42%96.73%44.13%-39.89%-46.14%-60.21%29.61%
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF		0.36%-5.26%2.06%68.91%-26.26%49.25%26.42%48.70%-30.92%59.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RES and ITB is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between RES and ITB has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RPC, Inc.

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF

Often compared with RES:
RES vs. QQQRES vs. DHRRES vs. ARAAFRES vs. BTCYRES vs. XLE
Often compared with ITB:
ITB vs. XHBITB vs. NAILITB vs. PKBITB vs. SPYITB vs. XLREITB vs. FSHOXITB vs. VGT

Return for Risk

RES vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RES
RES Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RES Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RES Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
ITB
ITB Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RES vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPC, Inc. (RES) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RESITBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.25
-0.06

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.65
0.14

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.02

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

-0.07

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

-0.13

+1.25

RES vs. ITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RES Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the ITB Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RES and ITB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RES vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RES drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, which is greater than ITB's maximum drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RES and ITB.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RESITBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.34%

-86.53%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.84%

-26.04%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.93%

-33.35%

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.75%

-40.55%

-23.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.34%

-52.10%

-40.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.76%

-23.92%

-51.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-37.02%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.91%

14.00%

-3.09%

Volatility

RES vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison

RPC, Inc. (RES) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) at 10.84%. This indicates that RES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RESITBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.62%

10.84%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.63%

22.25%

+16.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.42%

30.26%

+17.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.78%

29.51%

+23.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.35%

30.14%

+27.21%

Dividends

RES vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison

RES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than ITB's 0.67% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF		0.67%1.67%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%
RES
RPC, Inc.		2.83%2.94%2.69%2.20%0.45%0.00%0.00%2.86%4.76%0.51%0.25%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

RES and ITB have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RES has higher volatility (14.62%) compared to ITB (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RES dropped -92.34% vs ITB's -86.53%.

RES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RES and ITB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer