AQLT vs. POW
AQLT (iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AQLT is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Quality Index (Net), while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. AQLT is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AQLT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
AQLT vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AQLT achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.
AQLT
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 23.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AQLT vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AQLT iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF | 12.03% | 0.78% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.93% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between AQLT and POW is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AQLT vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
AQLT
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AQLT vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF (AQLT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AQLT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AQLT vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQLT drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQLT and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQLT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -18.37% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -18.37% | +17.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -4.33% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | — | — |
Volatility
AQLT vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AQLT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.17% | 32.94% | -18.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 32.94% | -15.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 32.94% | -15.91% |
AQLT vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AQLT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AQLT vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
AQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AQLT iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF | 0.99% | 1.05% | 0.02% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AQLT and POW have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AQLT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AQLT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
AQLT has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
AQLT is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AQLT and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for AQLT and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer