AQLT vs. VT
AQLT (iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - AQLT tracks the MSCI ACWI Quality Index (Net) while VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AQLT returned 29.00% vs 29.24% for VT. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AQLT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
AQLT vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AQLT having a 12.40% return and VT slightly lower at 12.24%.
AQLT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 12.40%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
AQLT vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AQLT iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF | 12.40% | 17.65% | -3.14% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | -3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between AQLT and VT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AQLT and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AQLT vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
AQLT
VT
AQLT vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF (AQLT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AQLT | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 3.04 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 13.53 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AQLT | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.31 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.44 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
AQLT vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQLT drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQLT and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQLT | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -50.27% | +33.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -9.67% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.88% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -7.02% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 2.17% | +0.20% |
Volatility
AQLT vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF (AQLT) is 3.54%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that AQLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AQLT | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 3.83% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 10.17% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 12.70% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 16.05% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.23% | -0.24% |
AQLT vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AQLT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AQLT vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
AQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQLT iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, AQLT and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to AQLT (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQLT dropped -16.84% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 1-year performance, VT leads with 29.24% vs 29.00% for AQLT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, AQLT has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VT has performed better with a 29.24% return vs 29.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AQLT.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.93% for AQLT.
AQLT tracks MSCI ACWI Quality Index (Net), while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AQLT and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AQLT and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer