APXCF vs. NB
APXCF (Apex Critical Metals Corp) and NB (NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, APXCF returned 42.25% vs 35.82% for NB. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APXCF vs. NB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APXCF achieves a -39.37% return, which is significantly lower than NB's -15.94% return.
APXCF
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -16.37%
- 6M
- -59.58%
- YTD
- -39.37%
- 1Y
- 42.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 53.90%
NB
- 1D
- 4.58%
- 1M
- -16.10%
- 6M
- -32.09%
- YTD
- -15.94%
- 1Y
- 35.82%
- 3Y*
- -1.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.46%
APXCF vs. NB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APXCF Apex Critical Metals Corp | -39.37% | 213.05% | 26.64% |
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock | -15.94% | 241.94% | -10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between APXCF and NB is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2024 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APXCF vs. NB — Risk / Return Rank
APXCF
NB
APXCF vs. NB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APXCF | NB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 0.80 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APXCF vs. NB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APXCF drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum NB drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APXCF and NB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APXCF | NB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -82.83% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.63% | -64.10% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.29% | -61.83% | -10.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.97% | -56.06% | +23.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.38% | 44.78% | +2.60% |
Volatility
APXCF vs. NB - Volatility Comparison
Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) have volatilities of 21.39% and 21.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APXCF | NB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.39% | 21.93% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.19% | 65.27% | -6.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 115.64% | 100.37% | +15.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.23% | 91.27% | +34.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.23% | 91.27% | +34.96% |
Dividends
APXCF vs. NB - Dividend Comparison
Neither APXCF nor NB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
APXCF vs. NB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apex Critical Metals Corp and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
APXCF and NB have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NB has higher volatility (21.93%) compared to APXCF (21.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APXCF dropped -73.63% vs NB's -82.83%.
APXCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APXCF and NB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer