APXCF vs. LYSDY
APXCF (Apex Critical Metals Corp) and LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, APXCF returned 42.25% vs 68.97% for LYSDY. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APXCF vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APXCF achieves a -39.37% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 36.28% return.
APXCF
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -16.37%
- 6M
- -59.58%
- YTD
- -39.37%
- 1Y
- 42.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 53.90%
LYSDY
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 36.28%
- 1Y
- 68.97%
- 3Y*
- 35.70%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- 68.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.42%
APXCF vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APXCF Apex Critical Metals Corp | -39.37% | 213.05% | 26.64% |
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR | 36.28% | 109.37% | -9.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between APXCF and LYSDY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2024 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APXCF vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank
APXCF
LYSDY
APXCF vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APXCF | LYSDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 1.49 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 2.98 | -2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APXCF vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APXCF drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APXCF and LYSDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APXCF | LYSDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -99.93% | +26.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.63% | -46.39% | -27.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -46.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -58.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.29% | -59.24% | -13.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.97% | -84.31% | +51.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.38% | 23.25% | +24.13% |
Volatility
APXCF vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison
Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) has a higher volatility of 21.39% compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) at 14.55%. This indicates that APXCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APXCF | LYSDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.39% | 14.55% | +6.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.19% | 42.81% | +16.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 115.64% | 64.09% | +51.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.23% | 50.67% | +75.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.23% | 278.45% | -152.22% |
Dividends
APXCF vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison
Neither APXCF nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
APXCF vs. LYSDY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apex Critical Metals Corp and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
APXCF and LYSDY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APXCF has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to LYSDY (14.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APXCF dropped -73.63% vs LYSDY's -99.93%.
LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APXCF and LYSDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer