PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRZ vs. JUNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRZ vs. JUNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRZ achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than JUNZ's 6.52% return.


APRZ

1D
-1.04%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
5.36%
6M
4.65%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*

JUNZ

1D
-0.96%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
6.52%
6M
5.75%
1Y
18.18%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRZ vs. JUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
APRZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF
5.36%12.97%18.46%22.23%-11.43%9.64%
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
6.52%12.83%17.32%17.28%-12.97%9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between APRZ and JUNZ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2021

0.99

The correlation between APRZ and JUNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRZ vs. JUNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRZ
APRZ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
APRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
APRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

JUNZ
JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRZ vs. JUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APRZJUNZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.21

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

9.51

-1.13

APRZ vs. JUNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the JUNZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRZ and JUNZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APRZ vs. JUNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRZ drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, roughly equal to the maximum JUNZ drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRZ and JUNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRZJUNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-17.88%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-8.27%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

-14.06%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.15%

-17.88%

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-2.14%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-4.24%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.92%

+0.12%

Volatility

APRZ vs. JUNZ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) at 3.39%. This indicates that APRZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JUNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRZJUNZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.39%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

8.29%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

10.33%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.60%

11.81%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.45%

11.75%

+0.70%

APRZ vs. JUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APRZ and JUNZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

APRZ vs. JUNZ - Dividend Comparison

APRZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than JUNZ's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
APRZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF
3.18%3.35%2.78%2.89%0.59%0.00%
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
2.16%2.30%3.97%6.03%0.56%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, APRZ and JUNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

APRZ has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to JUNZ (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRZ dropped -18.15% vs JUNZ's -17.88%.

On 5-year performance, APRZ leads with 10.61% vs 9.35% for JUNZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, APRZ has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRZ and JUNZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

APRZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.16% for JUNZ.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Price Return Index.

JUNZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRZ and JUNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer