APRZ vs. EAPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APRZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds - APRZ tracks the S&P 500 Price Return Index while EAPR tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, APRZ returned 11.19%/yr vs 5.15%/yr for EAPR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. APRZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.

Performance

APRZ vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRZ achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 11.39% return.

APRZ

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 4.07%
• YTD: 7.43%
• 6M: 7.28%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 16.23%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: —

EAPR

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 10.62%
• 5Y*: 5.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRZ vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF	7.43%	12.97%	18.46%	22.23%	-11.43%	13.37%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	11.39%	14.80%	2.86%	8.19%	-5.01%	-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between APRZ and EAPR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021	0.58

The correlation between APRZ and EAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

APRZ vs. EAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	APRZ	EAPR
Technology	35.3%	36.9%
Financial Services	13.4%	19.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	9.5%
Communication Services	9.9%	6.9%
Healthcare	8.8%	2.9%
Industrials	7.8%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	3.0%
Energy	3.0%	4.1%
Utilities	2.5%	2.1%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.1%
Basic Materials	1.6%	6.5%

Return for Risk

APRZ vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRZ

APRZ Risk / Return Rank: 57
APRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
APRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
APRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
APRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
APRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 58

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 94
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRZ vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APRZ	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	3.06	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	5.25	-2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.84	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	7.33	-5.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.13	42.15	-32.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APRZ vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRZ and EAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APRZ	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	3.06	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.51	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.54	+0.40

Drawdowns

APRZ vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRZ drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, roughly equal to the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRZ and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRZ	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.15%	-17.65%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-3.02%	-5.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.15%	-10.24%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.15%	-17.65%	-0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-0.45%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-4.06%	+0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	0.52%	+1.48%

Volatility

APRZ vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) is 2.39%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that APRZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APRZ	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.39%	3.79%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.06%	6.28%	+1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.23%	7.24%	+2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.52%	10.09%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.42%	10.02%	+2.40%

APRZ vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

APRZ vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

APRZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while EAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF	3.12%	3.35%	2.78%	2.89%	0.59%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APRZ and EAPR in my portfolio?

APRZ and EAPR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APRZ or EAPR?

EAPR has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to APRZ (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRZ dropped -18.15% vs EAPR's -17.65%.

Which ETF is better, APRZ or EAPR?

On 5-year performance, APRZ leads with 11.19% vs 5.15% for EAPR. On fees, APRZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APRZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APRZ or EAPR?

Over the 5-year period, APRZ has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 5.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRZ or EAPR?

APRZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRZ or EAPR?

APRZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.00% for EAPR.

What is the main difference between APRZ and EAPR?

APRZ tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while EAPR tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRZ and 0.89% for EAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.