APRZ vs. JULZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

APRZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF) and JULZ (Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APRZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while JULZ is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, APRZ returned 10.94%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for JULZ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

APRZ vs. JULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRZ achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than JULZ's 7.33% return.

APRZ

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 6.47%
• 6M: 6.08%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: 10.94%
• 10Y*: —

JULZ

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 6.94%
• 1Y: 20.61%
• 3Y*: 15.85%
• 5Y*: 10.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRZ vs. JULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF	6.47%	12.97%	18.46%	22.23%	-11.43%	13.39%
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	7.33%	13.23%	18.76%	17.65%	-9.34%	15.20%

Correlation

The correlation between APRZ and JULZ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.99

The correlation between APRZ and JULZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

APRZ vs. JULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRZ

APRZ Risk / Return Rank: 53
APRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
APRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
APRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
APRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
APRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 56

JULZ

JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 57
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRZ vs. JULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APRZ	JULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.93	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.66	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	2.43	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.47	10.32	-0.85

APRZ vs. JULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the JULZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRZ and JULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APRZ vs. JULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRZ drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than JULZ's maximum drawdown of -14.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRZ and JULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	APRZ	JULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.15%	-14.71%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-8.53%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.15%	-14.71%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.15%	-14.71%	-3.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-1.86%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-2.97%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	2.00%	+0.04%

Volatility

APRZ vs. JULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) is 3.57%, while Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that APRZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APRZ	JULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	3.91%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.57%	8.70%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63%	10.73%	-0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.59%	12.28%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.44%	12.35%	+0.09%

APRZ vs. JULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APRZ and JULZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

APRZ vs. JULZ - Dividend Comparison

APRZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than JULZ's 11.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
APRZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETF	3.15%	3.35%	2.78%	2.89%	0.59%
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	11.15%	11.96%	3.30%	3.59%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APRZ and JULZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, APRZ and JULZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, APRZ or JULZ?

JULZ has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to APRZ (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRZ dropped -18.15% vs JULZ's -14.71%.

Which ETF is better, APRZ or JULZ?

On 5-year performance, APRZ leads with 10.94% vs 10.93% for JULZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, APRZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APRZ or JULZ?

Over the 5-year period, APRZ has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APRZ or JULZ?

APRZ and JULZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APRZ or JULZ?

JULZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.15%, compared with 3.15% for APRZ.

What is the main difference between APRZ and JULZ?

APRZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while JULZ is Options Trading. APRZ tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while JULZ tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.