APLU vs. AGRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APLU (Allspring Core Plus ETF) and AGRW (Allspring LT Large Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APLU is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Allspring, while AGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Allspring. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APLU returned 5.67% vs 23.16% for AGRW. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APLU charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AGRW.

Performance

APLU vs. AGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLU achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than AGRW's 8.77% return.

APLU

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGRW

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: 7.09%
• YTD: 8.77%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: 23.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLU vs. AGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF	0.35%	5.51%
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	8.77%	23.16%

Correlation

The correlation between APLU and AGRW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

APLU vs. AGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLU

APLU Risk / Return Rank: 40
APLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
APLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
APLU Omega Ratio Rank: 40
APLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
APLU Martin Ratio Rank: 40

AGRW

AGRW Risk / Return Rank: 37
AGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
AGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLU vs. AGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APLU	AGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.46	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.02	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	1.41	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.22	4.73	+1.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APLU vs. AGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the AGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLU and AGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APLU	AGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	1.46	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.28	-0.53

Drawdowns

APLU vs. AGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLU drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum AGRW drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLU and AGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	APLU	AGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-16.46%	+13.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-16.46%	+13.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-2.36%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.89%	-3.28%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	4.91%	-4.00%

Volatility

APLU vs. AGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) is 1.44%, while Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that APLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APLU	AGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.44%	4.34%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	12.44%	-9.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.05%	15.91%	-11.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.06%	21.99%	-16.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.06%	21.99%	-16.93%

APLU vs. AGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLU has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than AGRW's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

APLU vs. AGRW - Dividend Comparison

APLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than AGRW's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	0.12%	0.13%	0.00%
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF	5.43%	5.13%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APLU and AGRW in my portfolio?

APLU and AGRW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APLU or AGRW?

AGRW has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to APLU (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLU dropped -3.24% vs AGRW's -16.46%.

Which ETF is better, APLU or AGRW?

On 1-year performance, AGRW leads with 23.16% vs 5.67% for APLU. On fees, APLU is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, APLU has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APLU or AGRW?

Over the 1-year period, AGRW has performed better with a 23.16% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APLU or AGRW?

APLU is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APLU or AGRW?

APLU has the higher dividend yield at 5.43%, compared with 0.12% for AGRW.

What is the main difference between APLU and AGRW?

APLU is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while AGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for APLU and 0.35% for AGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.