AGRW vs. ALRG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AGRW (Allspring LT Large Growth ETF) and ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Allspring, while ALRG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Allspring. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AGRW returned 12.48% vs 21.47% for ALRG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGRW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ALRG.

Performance

AGRW vs. ALRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) and Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGRW achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than ALRG's 9.44% return.

AGRW

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 5.05%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 1Y: 12.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALRG

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 2.10%
• 6M: 7.47%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGRW vs. ALRG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	5.86%	6.74%
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	9.44%	11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AGRW and ALRG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.87

The correlation between AGRW and ALRG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AGRW vs. ALRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGRW

AGRW Risk / Return Rank: 24
AGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
AGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
AGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 24
AGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
AGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 23

ALRG

ALRG Risk / Return Rank: 63
ALRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ALRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ALRG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
ALRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ALRG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGRW vs. ALRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) and Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGRW	ALRG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.69	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	2.38	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.30	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	2.33	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.36	9.58	-7.21

AGRW vs. ALRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the ALRG Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGRW and ALRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AGRW vs. ALRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGRW drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, which is greater than ALRG's maximum drawdown of -9.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRW and ALRG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGRW	ALRG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.46%	-9.27%	-7.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.46%	-9.27%	-7.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-0.62%	-4.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-1.40%	-2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	2.25%	+3.04%

Volatility

AGRW vs. ALRG - Volatility Comparison

Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) at 3.65%. This indicates that AGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGRW	ALRG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	3.65%	+1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.54%	10.04%	+3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.73%	12.76%	+3.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.85%	12.68%	+9.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.85%	12.68%	+9.17%

AGRW vs. ALRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGRW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ALRG's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGRW vs. ALRG - Dividend Comparison

AGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than ALRG's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	0.12%	0.13%
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	0.43%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGRW and ALRG in my portfolio?

AGRW and ALRG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AGRW or ALRG?

AGRW has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to ALRG (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRW dropped -16.46% vs ALRG's -9.27%.

Which ETF is better, AGRW or ALRG?

On 1-year performance, ALRG leads with 21.47% vs 12.48% for AGRW. On fees, ALRG is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, ALRG has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AGRW or ALRG?

Over the 1-year period, ALRG has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGRW or ALRG?

ALRG is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGRW or ALRG?

ALRG has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.12% for AGRW.

What is the main difference between AGRW and ALRG?

AGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ALRG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AGRW and 0.28% for ALRG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.