PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLU vs. AFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLU vs. AFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLU achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than AFIX's 0.59% return.


APLU

1D
0.12%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.79%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.71%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLU vs. AFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APLU
Allspring Core Plus ETF
0.51%7.38%-1.76%
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
0.59%7.52%-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between APLU and AFIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.88

The correlation between APLU and AFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLU vs. AFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLU
APLU Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
APLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
APLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLU vs. AFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APLUAFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.58

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

4.56

+0.36

APLU vs. AFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the AFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLU and AFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLU vs. AFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLU drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, roughly equal to the maximum AFIX drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLU and AFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLUAFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-3.33%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-3.10%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-1.60%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-0.99%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.07%

-0.10%

Volatility

APLU vs. AFIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) at 1.17%. This indicates that APLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLUAFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.17%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

2.97%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

3.94%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.04%

4.54%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

4.54%

+0.50%

APLU vs. AFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLU has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than AFIX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

APLU vs. AFIX - Dividend Comparison

APLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than AFIX's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.00%4.94%0.38%
APLU
Allspring Core Plus ETF
5.42%5.13%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


APLU and AFIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLU has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to AFIX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLU dropped -3.24% vs AFIX's -3.33%.

On 1-year performance, AFIX leads with 4.87% vs 4.75% for APLU. On fees, AFIX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AFIX has performed better with a 4.87% return vs 4.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AFIX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for APLU.

APLU has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 5.00% for AFIX.

APLU is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while AFIX is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for APLU and 0.20% for AFIX.

AFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLU and AFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer