APLU vs. ALRG
APLU (Allspring Core Plus ETF) and ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - APLU is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Allspring, while ALRG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Allspring. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APLU charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ALRG.
Performance
APLU vs. ALRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLU achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than ALRG's 9.39% return.
APLU
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALRG
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APLU vs. ALRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF | 0.35% | 4.18% |
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF | 9.39% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLU and ALRG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLU vs. ALRG — Risk / Return Rank
APLU
ALRG
APLU vs. ALRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU) and Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APLU | ALRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APLU | ALRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 2.01 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
APLU vs. ALRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLU drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum ALRG drawdown of -9.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLU and ALRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLU | ALRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -9.27% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.66% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -1.30% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility
APLU vs. ALRG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLU | ALRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 12.52% | -8.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 12.52% | -7.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 12.52% | -7.46% |
APLU vs. ALRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
APLU has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ALRG's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
APLU vs. ALRG - Dividend Comparison
APLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than ALRG's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
APLU Allspring Core Plus ETF | 5.43% | 5.13% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APLU and ALRG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ALRG is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ALRG is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for APLU.
APLU has the higher dividend yield at 5.43%, compared with 0.43% for ALRG.
APLU is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while ALRG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for APLU and 0.28% for ALRG.
Find the right allocation for APLU and ALRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer