PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLD vs. DAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APLD vs. DAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLD achieves a 74.14% return, which is significantly higher than DAC's 41.54% return. Over the past 10 years, APLD has outperformed DAC with an annualized return of 125.13%, while DAC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.38% annualized return.


APLD

1D
2.97%
1M
-8.58%
YTD
74.14%
6M
53.27%
1Y
281.93%
3Y*
69.23%
5Y*
112.30%
10Y*
125.13%

DAC

1D
0.95%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
41.54%
6M
41.94%
1Y
52.23%
3Y*
31.85%
5Y*
16.62%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLD vs. DAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
74.14%220.94%13.35%266.30%-56.09%11,789.90%389.44%-34.55%64.99%-33.33%
DAC
Danaos Corporation
41.54%22.24%12.41%47.51%-26.57%256.10%133.44%-12.57%-48.28%-45.28%

Correlation

The correlation between APLD and DAC is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2008

0.06

The correlation between APLD and DAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APLD:

$11.60B

DAC:

$2.39B

EPS

APLD:

-$0.72

DAC:

$28.34

PS Ratio

APLD:

28.94

DAC:

2.31

PB Ratio

APLD:

7.37

DAC:

0.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

APLD:

$390.57M

DAC:

$1.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APLD:

$124.93M

DAC:

$705.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

APLD:

-$154.66M

DAC:

$739.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLD vs. DAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLD
APLD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
APLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
APLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DAC
DAC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLD vs. DAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APLDDACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

4.52

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

14.35

-2.64

APLD vs. DAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the DAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLD and DAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLD vs. DAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLD drawdown since its inception was -99.73%, roughly equal to the maximum DAC drawdown of -99.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLD and DAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLDDACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.73%

-99.42%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.31%

-12.58%

-37.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.66%

-28.87%

-47.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.61%

-50.14%

-32.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.80%

-95.81%

+6.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.00%

-66.36%

+52.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.86%

-80.43%

+5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.22%

3.95%

+17.27%

Volatility

APLD vs. DAC - Volatility Comparison

Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a higher volatility of 33.15% compared to Danaos Corporation (DAC) at 6.04%. This indicates that APLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLDDACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.15%

6.04%

+27.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.49%

16.51%

+63.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.13%

21.41%

+85.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

165.20%

34.36%

+130.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

301.46%

65.00%

+236.46%

Dividends

APLD vs. DAC - Dividend Comparison

APLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DAC
Danaos Corporation
2.70%3.66%4.06%4.12%5.70%2.01%

Financials

APLD vs. DAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Digital Corporation and Danaos Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
161.76M
253.70M
(APLD) Total Revenue
(DAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APLD vs. DAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Applied Digital Corporation and Danaos Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
51.0%
59.3%
Portfolio components
APLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 82.52M and revenue of 161.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.

DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

APLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported an operating income of -62.13M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in an operating margin of -38.4%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

APLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a net income of -104.11M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in a net margin of -64.4%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APLD and DAC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLD has higher volatility (33.15%) compared to DAC (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLD dropped -99.73% vs DAC's -99.42%.

DAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLD and DAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer