PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APH vs. LHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APH vs. LHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amphenol Corporation (APH) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than LHX's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has outperformed LHX with an annualized return of 26.67%, while LHX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.23% annualized return.


APH

1D
3.45%
1M
12.16%
YTD
6.47%
6M
2.93%
1Y
54.90%
3Y*
55.57%
5Y*
34.64%
10Y*
26.67%

LHX

1D
-1.86%
1M
1.23%
YTD
3.68%
6M
8.07%
1Y
25.68%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
16.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APH vs. LHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APH
Amphenol Corporation
6.47%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%35.25%22.09%34.91%-6.82%31.81%
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
3.68%42.28%1.88%3.67%-0.48%14.98%-2.76%49.21%-3.38%40.80%

Correlation

The correlation between APH and LHX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 1991

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between APH and LHX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

APH:

$4.58

LHX:

$12.29

PE Ratio

APH:

31.32

LHX:

24.58

PEG Ratio

APH:

1.04

LHX:

12.60

PS Ratio

APH:

7.11

LHX:

1.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

APH:

$25.90B

LHX:

$22.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APH:

$9.67B

LHX:

$5.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

APH:

$7.45B

LHX:

$3.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APH vs. LHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

LHX
LHX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APH vs. LHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APHLHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.25

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

3.41

+1.66

APH vs. LHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APH Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the LHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APH and LHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APHLHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.06

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.38

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

0.64

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.32

+0.31

Drawdowns

APH vs. LHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum LHX drawdown of -69.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and LHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APHLHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-69.82%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.19%

-20.55%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-25.98%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.73%

-38.16%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

-38.16%

+0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.45%

-19.58%

+6.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-21.33%

+7.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.87%

7.56%

+3.31%

Volatility

APH vs. LHX - Volatility Comparison

Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) at 6.66%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APHLHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.86%

6.66%

+10.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.53%

19.74%

+16.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.97%

24.33%

+16.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.54%

23.91%

+6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.83%

25.42%

+2.41%

Dividends

APH vs. LHX - Dividend Comparison

APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than LHX's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.58%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
1.62%1.64%2.21%2.17%2.15%1.91%1.80%1.45%1.86%1.55%2.01%2.23%

Financials

APH vs. LHX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.62B
5.74B
(APH) Total Revenue
(LHX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APH vs. LHX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amphenol Corporation and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
24.4%
Portfolio components
APH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

LHX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 5.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

APH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

LHX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 652.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

APH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.

LHX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 512.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APH and LHX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APH has higher volatility (16.86%) compared to LHX (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs LHX's -69.82%.

APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APH and LHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer