APH vs. BR
APH (Amphenol Corporation) and BR (Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — APH in Electronic Components, BR in Information Technology Services. Over the past 10 years, APH returned 27.74%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for BR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APH vs. BR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than BR's -34.29% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has outperformed BR with an annualized return of 27.74%, while BR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.42% annualized return.
APH
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 23.40%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 63.73%
- 3Y*
- 57.45%
- 5Y*
- 36.37%
- 10Y*
- 27.74%
BR
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- -34.29%
- 6M
- -36.25%
- 1Y
- -38.35%
- 3Y*
- -0.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
APH vs. BR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 14.03% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | -34.29% | 0.27% | 11.65% | 56.23% | -25.26% | 21.12% | 26.28% | 30.59% | 7.86% | 39.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between APH and BR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007 | 0.48 |
The correlation between APH and BR shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
APH:
$198.36B
BR:
$16.95B
APH:
$4.58
BR:
$9.35
APH:
33.54
BR:
15.50
APH:
1.12
BR:
1.37
APH:
7.62
BR:
2.33
APH:
14.19
BR:
6.01
APH:
$25.90B
BR:
$7.32B
APH:
$9.67B
BR:
$2.29B
APH:
$7.45B
BR:
$1.98B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APH vs. BR — Risk / Return Rank
APH
BR
APH vs. BR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APH | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.73 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | -0.84 | +3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | -1.55 | +7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APH vs. BR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than BR's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and BR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APH | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -59.02% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.19% | -45.55% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.19% | -45.55% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | -45.55% | +16.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | -45.55% | +7.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -44.60% | +37.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.56% | -9.04% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.92% | 24.78% | -13.86% |
Volatility
APH vs. BR - Volatility Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 15.50% compared to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) at 8.82%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APH | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.50% | 8.82% | +6.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.39% | 21.61% | +15.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.68% | 25.53% | +16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 23.44% | +7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 23.90% | +4.03% |
Dividends
APH vs. BR - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than BR's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.54% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 2.69% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.48% | 2.04% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.53% | 1.90% | 2.12% |
Financials
APH vs. BR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APH vs. BR - Profitability Comparison
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
BR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 626.90M and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
BR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 359.50M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
BR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 276.30M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APH and BR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APH has higher volatility (15.50%) compared to BR (8.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs BR's -59.02%.
APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APH and BR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer