APGZX vs. MGK
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK).
APGZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 1, 2015. MGK is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
APGZX vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APGZX vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | -9.67% | 13.26% | 25.47% | 35.12% | -28.74% | 29.00% | 34.47% | 34.24% | 2.30% | 31.81% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | -9.86% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with APGZX having a -9.67% return and MGK slightly lower at -9.86%. Over the past 10 years, APGZX has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 14.92%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.97% annualized return.
APGZX
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -9.63%
- 1Y
- 10.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.92%
MGK
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- -9.86%
- 6M
- -7.94%
- 1Y
- 19.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 16.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
APGZX vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
APGZX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
APGZX vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
APGZX
MGK
APGZX vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APGZX | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 0.85 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.39 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 1.23 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 4.27 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APGZX | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.85 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.56 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.78 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.60 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between APGZX and MGK is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
APGZX vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
APGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than MGK's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | 10.81% | 9.77% | 6.62% | 1.69% | 0.87% | 7.19% | 2.60% | 3.49% | 9.11% | 3.78% | 2.72% | 0.00% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
APGZX vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APGZX drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum MGK drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGZX and MGK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APGZX | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -47.97% | +14.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.21% | -16.85% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.87% | -36.01% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -36.01% | +2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -12.56% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -7.51% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 4.87% | -0.90% |
Volatility
APGZX vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) is 6.50%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that APGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APGZX | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 7.13% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 12.93% | -1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 23.35% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 22.63% | -2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.63% | 21.82% | -2.19% |