APGZX vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

APGZX (AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - APGZX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, APGZX returned 16.68%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APGZX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

APGZX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APGZX achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, APGZX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 16.68%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.77% annualized return.

APGZX

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 3.82%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: 15.53%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 16.68%

VOO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 9.30%
• 1Y: 26.77%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APGZX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	3.82%	13.26%	25.47%	35.12%	-28.74%	29.00%	34.47%	34.24%	2.30%	31.81%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	9.75%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between APGZX and VOO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.92

The correlation between APGZX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

APGZX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APGZX

APGZX Risk / Return Rank: 13
APGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
APGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
APGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
APGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
APGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APGZX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APGZX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	2.17	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	2.93	-1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.39	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	3.02	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.52	13.58	-10.06

APGZX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APGZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APGZX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APGZX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APGZX drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGZX and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	APGZX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.87%	-33.99%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.21%	-8.90%	-6.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.57%	-18.69%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.87%	-24.52%	-9.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.87%	-33.99%	+0.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	-1.74%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.01%	-3.68%	-2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	1.98%	+2.16%

Volatility

APGZX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that APGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APGZX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.42%	4.60%	+0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.82%	9.73%	+2.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	12.39%	+2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	16.90%	+3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.71%	18.05%	+1.66%

APGZX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

APGZX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

APGZX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

APGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	9.41%	9.77%	6.62%	1.69%	0.87%	7.19%	2.60%	3.49%	9.11%	3.78%	2.72%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APGZX and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, APGZX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, APGZX or VOO?

APGZX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APGZX dropped -33.87% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.