APG vs. CLS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about APi Group Corporation (APG) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).

Performance

APG vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in APi Group Corporation (APG) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APG vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APG APi Group Corporation	5.91%	59.55%	3.96%	83.94%	-27.01%	41.98%	74.52%
CLS Celestica Inc.	-4.71%	220.27%	215.23%	159.80%	1.26%	37.92%	31.65%

Fundamentals

Market Cap APG : $16.86B CLS : $32.65B
EPS APG : -$0.71 CLS : $7.19
PS Ratio APG : 2.15 CLS : 2.63
PB Ratio APG : 4.95 CLS : 14.76
Total Revenue (TTM) APG : $7.91B CLS : $12.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) APG : $2.49B CLS : $1.44B
EBITDA (TTM) APG : $867.00M CLS : $1.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APG achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's -4.71% return.

APG

• 1D: 3.61%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: 5.91%
• 6M: 17.89%
• 1Y: 69.97%
• 3Y*: 39.31%
• 5Y*: 22.99%
• 10Y*: —

CLS

• 1D: 9.49%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 257.42%
• 3Y*: 179.50%
• 5Y*: 100.42%
• 10Y*: 38.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

APG vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APG

APG Risk / Return Rank: 93
APG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
APG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
APG Omega Ratio Rank: 91
APG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
APG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APG vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for APi Group Corporation (APG) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APG	CLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	3.61	-1.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.28	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.05	8.23	-3.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.65	21.92	-4.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APG vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APG Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APG and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APG	CLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	3.61	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	1.81	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	0.25	+0.81

Correlation

The correlation between APG and CLS is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

APG vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither APG nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

APG vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APG drawdown since its inception was -49.62%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APG and CLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	APG	CLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.62%	-96.93%	+47.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.65%	-29.24%	+15.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.62%	-53.96%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.53%	-20.12%	+9.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.39%	-73.79%	+63.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	10.98%	-7.08%

Volatility

APG vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for APi Group Corporation (APG) is 11.29%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 23.87%. This indicates that APG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APG	CLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.29%	23.87%	-12.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.48%	54.95%	-34.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.95%	72.02%	-42.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.37%	55.73%	-23.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.07%	48.76%	-15.69%

Financials

APG vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between APi Group Corporation and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

APG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a gross profit of 678.00M and revenue of 2.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.0%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.57M and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

APG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, APi Group Corporation reported an operating income of 164.00M and revenue of 2.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.8%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 325.73M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

APG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a net income of -493.00M and revenue of 2.12B, resulting in a net margin of -23.3%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 271.61M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.