APG vs. ANAB
APG (APi Group Corporation) and ANAB (AnaptysBio, Inc.) are both stocks. APG operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while ANAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, APG returned 23.23%/yr vs 28.21%/yr for ANAB. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APG vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APG achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than ANAB's 73.48% return.
APG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 35.55%
- 5Y*
- 23.23%
- 10Y*
- —
ANAB
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- 73.48%
- 6M
- 87.15%
- 1Y
- 259.27%
- 3Y*
- 64.14%
- 5Y*
- 28.21%
- 10Y*
- —
APG vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APG APi Group Corporation | 10.66% | 59.55% | 3.96% | 83.94% | -27.01% | 41.98% | 79.17% |
ANAB AnaptysBio, Inc. | 73.48% | 266.16% | -38.19% | -30.88% | -10.82% | 61.63% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between APG and ANAB is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
APG:
$18.42B
ANAB:
$1.61B
APG:
$0.73
ANAB:
-$0.91
APG:
2.20
ANAB:
7.11
APG:
5.28
ANAB:
126.20
APG:
$8.17B
ANAB:
$232.39M
APG:
$2.57B
ANAB:
$245.59M
APG:
$820.00M
ANAB:
$52.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APG vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank
APG
ANAB
APG vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for APi Group Corporation (APG) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APG | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.53 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 9.28 | -7.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 22.38 | -17.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APG vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APG drawdown since its inception was -49.62%, smaller than the maximum ANAB drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APG and ANAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APG | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.62% | -92.08% | +42.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | -28.15% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.23% | -69.32% | +48.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.62% | -69.32% | +19.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.29% | -34.57% | +20.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.33% | -64.64% | +54.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 11.64% | -5.63% |
Volatility
APG vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for APi Group Corporation (APG) is 10.16%, while AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) has a volatility of 12.40%. This indicates that APG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APG | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.16% | 12.40% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.26% | 46.31% | -24.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.63% | 68.78% | -40.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.63% | 65.31% | -32.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.16% | 75.44% | -42.28% |
Dividends
APG vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison
Neither APG nor ANAB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
APG vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between APi Group Corporation and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
APG and ANAB have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANAB has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to APG (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APG dropped -49.62% vs ANAB's -92.08%.
ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APG and ANAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer