APA vs. BNO
APA (Apache Corporation) is a stock, while BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Over the past 10 years, APA returned -1.22%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for BNO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
APA vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APA achieves a 58.80% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return. Over the past 10 years, APA has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of -1.22%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.13% annualized return.
APA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- 58.80%
- 6M
- 45.42%
- 1Y
- 122.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- -1.22%
BNO
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- 85.31%
- 6M
- 79.66%
- 1Y
- 88.71%
- 3Y*
- 26.74%
- 5Y*
- 23.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
APA vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APA Apache Corporation | 58.80% | 11.54% | -33.44% | -21.24% | 76.44% | 90.76% | -43.71% | 1.12% | -36.39% | -32.13% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 85.31% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | -38.23% | 36.01% | -15.30% | 15.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between APA and BNO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010 | 0.57 |
The correlation between APA and BNO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APA vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
APA
BNO
APA vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apache Corporation (APA) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APA | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.31 | 4.99 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.65 | 9.39 | +6.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APA | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.15 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.67 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.36 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.14 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
APA vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APA drawdown since its inception was -96.73%, which is greater than BNO's maximum drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APA and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APA | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.73% | -87.06% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.49% | -17.87% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.45% | -23.75% | -43.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.47% | -33.70% | -36.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.49% | -75.18% | -18.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.70% | -12.72% | -50.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.33% | -40.16% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 9.48% | -1.64% |
Volatility
APA vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
Apache Corporation (APA) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) have volatilities of 14.41% and 14.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APA | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.41% | 14.12% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.37% | 36.21% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.02% | 41.56% | +4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.48% | 35.40% | +13.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.38% | 36.69% | +21.69% |
Dividends
APA vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
APA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APA Apache Corporation | 2.62% | 4.09% | 4.33% | 2.79% | 1.34% | 0.51% | 2.29% | 3.91% | 3.81% | 2.37% | 1.58% | 2.25% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APA and BNO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APA has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to BNO (14.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APA dropped -96.73% vs BNO's -87.06%.
APA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APA and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer