PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APA vs. MPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APA vs. MPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apache Corporation (APA) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APA achieves a 42.09% return, which is significantly lower than MPC's 53.40% return. Over the past 10 years, APA has underperformed MPC with an annualized return of -2.18%, while MPC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.24% annualized return.


APA

1D
3.54%
1M
-11.86%
YTD
42.09%
6M
42.39%
1Y
78.39%
3Y*
5.56%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
-2.18%

MPC

1D
1.80%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
53.40%
6M
51.41%
1Y
49.08%
3Y*
33.05%
5Y*
35.24%
10Y*
25.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APA vs. MPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APA
Apache Corporation
42.09%11.54%-33.44%-21.24%76.44%90.76%-43.71%1.12%-36.39%-32.13%
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
53.40%19.17%-4.06%30.46%86.62%61.00%-27.38%6.05%-8.23%34.78%

Correlation

The correlation between APA and MPC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2011

0.52

The correlation between APA and MPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APA:

$12.11B

MPC:

$72.95B

EPS

APA:

$4.28

MPC:

$15.35

PE Ratio

APA:

7.99

MPC:

16.11

PEG Ratio

APA:

0.10

MPC:

0.07

PS Ratio

APA:

1.42

MPC:

0.55

PB Ratio

APA:

1.88

MPC:

4.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

APA:

$8.61B

MPC:

$135.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APA:

$4.64B

MPC:

$11.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

APA:

$5.63B

MPC:

$12.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APA vs. MPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APA
APA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
APA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
APA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
APA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
APA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MPC
MPC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APA vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apache Corporation (APA) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APAMPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.69

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

7.03

+2.39

APA vs. MPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APA Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the MPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APA and MPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APA vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APA drawdown since its inception was -96.73%, which is greater than MPC's maximum drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APA and MPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APAMPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.73%

-79.67%

-17.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

-18.33%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.45%

-44.75%

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.47%

-44.75%

-25.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.49%

-79.67%

-13.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.52%

-7.45%

-60.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.36%

-17.31%

-23.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

7.01%

+1.45%

Volatility

APA vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison

Apache Corporation (APA) has a higher volatility of 12.69% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) at 10.61%. This indicates that APA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APAMPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.69%

10.61%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.87%

26.12%

+7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.69%

32.06%

+14.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.52%

33.09%

+15.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.45%

40.22%

+18.23%

Dividends

APA vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison

APA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than MPC's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APA
Apache Corporation
2.92%4.09%4.33%2.79%1.34%0.51%2.29%3.91%3.81%2.37%1.58%2.25%
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
1.58%2.29%2.43%2.07%2.14%3.63%5.61%3.52%3.12%2.30%2.70%2.20%

Financials

APA vs. MPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apache Corporation and Marathon Petroleum Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
2.33B
34.57B
(APA) Total Revenue
(MPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APA vs. MPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apache Corporation and Marathon Petroleum Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
96.8%
9.6%
Portfolio components
APA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apache Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.25B and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.8%.

MPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.31B and revenue of 34.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

APA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apache Corporation reported an operating income of 999.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.

MPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported an operating income of 1.40B and revenue of 34.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

APA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apache Corporation reported a net income of 446.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.

MPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a net income of 511.00M and revenue of 34.57B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APA and MPC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APA has higher volatility (12.69%) compared to MPC (10.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APA dropped -96.73% vs MPC's -79.67%.

APA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APA and MPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer