APA vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about Apache Corporation (APA) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Performance
APA vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APA vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APA Apache Corporation | 70.66% | 11.54% | -33.44% | -21.24% | 76.44% | 90.76% | -43.71% | 1.12% | -36.39% | -32.13% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 27.56% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Fundamentals
APA:
$14.68B
FANG:
$54.48B
APA:
$3.99
FANG:
$5.75
APA:
10.36
FANG:
33.15
APA:
1.67
FANG:
3.68
APA:
1.32
FANG:
1.47
APA:
$8.92B
FANG:
$14.98B
APA:
$2.62B
FANG:
$7.48B
APA:
$4.29B
FANG:
$7.31B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APA achieves a 70.66% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's 27.56% return. Over the past 10 years, APA has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 1.12%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
APA
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 30.48%
- YTD
- 70.66%
- 6M
- 68.44%
- 1Y
- 105.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 1.12%
FANG
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 27.56%
- 6M
- 34.51%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 23.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APA vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
APA
FANG
APA vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apache Corporation (APA) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APA | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 0.56 | +1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 0.98 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.13 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 0.86 | +2.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.88 | 2.18 | +7.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APA | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 0.56 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.62 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.25 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.46 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between APA and FANG is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
APA vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
APA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than FANG's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APA Apache Corporation | 2.42% | 4.09% | 4.33% | 2.79% | 1.34% | 0.51% | 2.29% | 3.91% | 3.81% | 2.37% | 1.58% | 2.25% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
APA vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APA drawdown since its inception was -96.73%, which is greater than FANG's maximum drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APA and FANG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APA | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.73% | -88.72% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.95% | -26.16% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.47% | -42.10% | -28.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.49% | -88.72% | -4.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.99% | -5.72% | -55.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.25% | -19.57% | -20.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 10.33% | +0.48% |
Volatility
APA vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Apache Corporation (APA) has a higher volatility of 11.45% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 8.16%. This indicates that APA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APA | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.45% | 8.16% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.61% | 20.91% | +10.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.99% | 39.22% | +15.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.52% | 38.39% | +10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.23% | 48.95% | +9.28% |
Financials
APA vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apache Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities