AOTS vs. XLK
AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AOTS tracks the AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
AOTS vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -15.55% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.51% return.
AOTS
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- -15.55%
- 6M
- -15.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 6M
- 26.47%
- 1Y
- 48.82%
- 3Y*
- 31.01%
- 5Y*
- 21.42%
- 10Y*
- 25.76%
AOTS vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | -15.55% | -0.83% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.51% | -0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTS and XLK is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTS vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
AOTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLK
AOTS vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOTS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOTS vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -82.05% | +62.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.68% | -6.77% | -9.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -34.89% | +24.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.02% | — |
Volatility
AOTS vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.67% | 23.42% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 25.37% | -5.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 24.71% | -5.04% |
AOTS vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTS vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTS and XLK have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AOTS.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.
AOTS tracks AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: AOT and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for AOTS and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer