AOTS vs. UFOX
AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and UFOX (Defiance Connective Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AOTS tracks the AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index while UFOX tracks the BlueStar Connective Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for UFOX.
Performance
AOTS vs. UFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -15.55% return, which is significantly lower than UFOX's 38.89% return.
AOTS
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- -15.55%
- 6M
- -15.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFOX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -13.49%
- YTD
- 38.89%
- 6M
- 36.87%
- 1Y
- 72.23%
- 3Y*
- 41.12%
- 5Y*
- 19.98%
- 10Y*
- —
AOTS vs. UFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | -15.55% | -0.83% |
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 38.89% | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTS and UFOX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTS vs. UFOX — Risk / Return Rank
AOTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UFOX
AOTS vs. UFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOTS | UFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOTS vs. UFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum UFOX drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and UFOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTS | UFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -33.90% | +13.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.68% | -16.73% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -9.03% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.01% | — |
Volatility
AOTS vs. UFOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTS | UFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.67% | 28.22% | -8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 25.19% | -5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 25.52% | -5.85% |
AOTS vs. UFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than UFOX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTS vs. UFOX - Dividend Comparison
AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 0.43% | 0.56% | 0.79% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 0.99% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTS and UFOX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UFOX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UFOX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AOTS.
UFOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.
AOTS tracks AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while UFOX tracks BlueStar Connective Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.30% for UFOX.
Find the right allocation for AOTS and UFOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer