AOTS vs. IDGT
AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AOTS tracks the AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index while IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for IDGT.
Performance
AOTS vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 54.64% return.
AOTS
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDGT
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 54.64%
- 6M
- 51.00%
- 1Y
- 62.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.39%
AOTS vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | -5.28% | -0.83% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 54.64% | -0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTS and IDGT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTS vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank
AOTS
IDGT
AOTS vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOTS | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | 0.18 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
AOTS vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and IDGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTS | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -77.95% | +58.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -1.10% | -5.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -19.91% | +9.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.82% | — |
Volatility
AOTS vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTS | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 20.37% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 23.19% | -3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 23.29% | -3.91% |
AOTS vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTS vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison
AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTS and IDGT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AOTS.
IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.
AOTS tracks AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: AOT and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.41% for IDGT.
Find the right allocation for AOTS and IDGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer